User talk:Paradise Chronicle

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 10 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 7 days. For the archive overview, see Archive/. The latest archive is located at Archive/2024.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Paradise Chronicle!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:37, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-17[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brachiale Löschaktion/Brachial extinguishing action[edit]

Paradise Chronicle (Diskussion) After I've realized, that you are also working as rigid terminator on other French architectural objects to abolish them from WIKIMEDIA Commons, such as the Unité d`habitation à Marseille, I hope that you are able to see the damage you are producing to the WIKIPEDIA Encyclopedia. Therefore I think you should give up your allegation of beeing an admirer of Le Corbusier and his work, which now COMMONwise falls into informative pieces like https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:La_Tourette_1.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Couvent_de_la_Tourette_-_9.JPG I do repeat my already expressed lack of understanding towards your action:

I don't understand, that your main effort seems to be the extinction of a lot of images which are important for the visual understanding of architecture, thus reducing the quality of Wikipedia as Encyclopedia. Most of these files (uploaded under the Wikipedia articles: Saint Marie e la Tourette and Notre Dame du Haut) sustained for different reasons any deletions since years, despite the surveillance of bots and the supervision of competent users and admins. Everybody who is struggeling in search of exceptions for image-publishing within the limits of French legislation is forced to interpret the code de la propriété intellectuelle (CPI), is bound to a shaky French FoP and has to be regardful towards the Wikimedia rules, which allow commercial usage of files, even if the author has no such usage in mind. Another dramatic handicap for Wikimedia/Wikipedia interests is the existence of the French ADAGP Society, which undermines a European solution and the improvement of FoP. Therefore riding only "No FoP in France" horses and the bureocratic use of "author´s death plus 70 years" as tunnel vision, does not help to develop and broaden worldwide knowledge.

After you made the proposal to upload images on WIKIPEDIA and not on WIKIMEDIA, which does not work, you are either absolutely not informed or - a member of the French ADAGP society... With this cynical joke I say (not good), but only bye. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 10:52, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are maybe a bit emotional in your reaction to the DR. I have been affected by DRs as well. It's a normal thing to happen to a newcomer and I didn't get a personal explanation like you did. And I believe I was rather friendly and in search of cooperation in my approach to you. On the Wikipedia upload I was also surprised that it was possible in the German Wikipedia (apparently only at some time in the past), but it is still possible in the English wikipedia, so there you might be more successful. And the bots are often not reliable if it relates to DRs, as we notice often. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]